49 Types of Rubrics

Holistic Rubric

A holistic rubric includes all criteria (such as clarity, organization, mechanics) considered together in a single evaluation. The grader assigns a single score based on an overall judgment of the student’s work, using descriptions of each performance level.

Advantages

• Emphasizes what learners demonstrate rather than what they cannot
• Saves grader time by minimizing evaluations
• Can be used consistently across raters with training

Disadvantages

• Provides less specific feedback
• Difficult to choose a score when work varies across criteria
• Cannot indicate weighting of criteria

Example

Example of a holistic rubric for a final paper:

Performance Level

Description

Above Average

The central message is clear and engaging with relevant details. Information is logical and natural. Minimal to no errors in grammar and spelling.

Sufficient

The focus is clear and supported by relevant ideas. Information is logical and easy to follow. Few errors in grammar and spelling.

Developing

The central purpose is identifiable with clear supporting ideas. Information is orderly and mostly easy to follow. Noticeable grammar and spelling errors.

Needs Improvement

The central ideas are unclear. Information is disorganized and hard to follow. Significant grammar and spelling errors.


Analytic/Descriptive Rubric

An analytic rubric lists criteria in the left column and levels of performance across the top row. Each cell describes the criterion at a given performance level. Each criterion is scored individually.

Advantages

• Provides detailed feedback on strengths and weaknesses
• Allows weighting of each criterion

Disadvantages

• Time-consuming to create and use
• Requires well-defined cells for consistency across raters
• May result in less personalized feedback

Example

Example of an analytic rubric for a final paper:

Criteria

Above Average (4)

Sufficient (3)

Developing (2)

Needs Improvement (1)

Clarity – 60%

Clear purpose with well-focused, relevant details.

Clear purpose with mostly focused, relevant details.

Identifiable purpose with mostly focused ideas.

Unclear purpose with disconnected ideas.

Organization – 20%

Logical sequence that flows naturally.

Logical sequence with minor issues.

Mostly logical sequence.

Poorly sequenced and hard to follow.

Mechanics – 20%

Minimal to no errors in grammar and spelling.

Few grammar and spelling errors.

Noticeable grammar and spelling errors.

Significant grammar and spelling errors.


Single-Point Rubric

A single-point rubric describes criteria at the “proficient” level and provides space for feedback on improvement and excellence.

Advantages

• Easier to create than an analytic rubric
• Students are more likely to read descriptors
• Open-ended areas for feedback
• Reduces focus on grades
• May increase creativity in projects

Disadvantage

• Requires more work for instructors writing feedback

Example

Example of a single-point rubric for a group project:

Criteria

Proficient

Feedback

Criteria #1

Description reflecting proficient performance

Criteria #2

Description reflecting proficient performance

Criteria #3

Description reflecting proficient performance

Criteria #4

Description reflecting proficient performance

North Carolina State University. (n.d.). Rubric best practices, examples, and templates. NC State University. Retrieved May 31, 2024, from https://teaching-resources.delta.ncsu.edu/rubric_best-practices-examples-templates/

Note: This resource was reused with the assistance of OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

NOVA Online Course Design Bootcamp Workbook Copyright © by Caryn Sever is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book